msgbartop
and his Coffee-Break Brain-Dump
msgbarbottom

05 Feb 10 John Terry has been doing more than just Wayne Bridge’s ex.

Okay, at the risk of this turning into a grubby gossip column, here is a some grubby gossip. I found this on The Oatcake:

The Sun have a round up of the current John Terry rumours which will make the paper over the next few weeks:

  1. The Sun have lined up another EIGHT women who’ve slept with him in the last 18 months or so. Enough for a couple of weeks of front pages. Including FHMs own HSH, Tanya Robinson
  2. The front page today that Bridges ex, Vanessa, has slept with five members of the Chelsea squad is only the beginning. Two other Chelsea players – Gudjonsen and Drogba – were also sleeping with Bridge’s girlfriend at the same time as Terry.
  3. The Sun is also paying Vanessa 250k to dish everything including the fact that the mystery fifth Chelsea player is, depressingly predictably, Ashley Cole. Which should give Cheryl the excuse she needs to finally dump him (now shes no longer Racist Toilet Cleaner Puncher, but the new Nations Sweetheart)
  4. JT has also been sleeping with current team mate Hilario’s wife (who also has kids).
  5. Away from the bedroom, JT also owes Wembley a substantial amount of money for a box he owns and hasn’t paid for, even after he had mates in there racking up a 20k bill at the FA Cup final.

Question is, will he have the energy to lift the world cup in summer if we should win it?

04 Feb 10 Apple iPad – Guess the review – What can we learn from history?

Apparently Apple has launched its iPad – news has even made it to Worcestershire! Apple fans love it. Geeks hate it. Why  is that so predictable? Or is it? I’m just predicting that’s what the response will be. I haven’t read a single review yet, so before I do, based entirely on twenty years of Mac use, here is what I think the conclusion will be:

If history is anything to go by, the iPad will be innovative in its own way – but not by some other people’s definition of innovative. It will probably disappoint the techno-purists because it will use whatever edge it has to satisfy some kind of mass market potential (and critically it won’t be Microsoft or Linux). And the same techno purists will be quick to point out that some gizmo or other does some or all of it’s functions better and uses some or other connectivity or processor or screen that ‘rocks’ (said in the way only geeks can pronounce it) while the iPad ‘sucks man’ (again said in John Major meets Michael Moore geek accent). It will extend the Apple ethos of the Digital Hub making it a natural add-on to the rest of the i-suite of things out there, which will again anger someone for some reason.

Basically, it will infuriate the anti Apple brigade simply because it will be made by Apple. That has always been enough to bring out IT geeks the world over to burn effigies of Steve Jobs.

Steve Wozniac, co-founder of Apple back in the day and ‘not bitter at all’ exile these days, will appear in some Tech mag and tell us how he came up with the idea in the first place, back in the 1980′s and it would be much better if it employed some unpronounceable concept that only he understands.

Over time, the release version will prove to be underpowered and comparatively slow, lacking in memory and it will be unstable until about version 1.3. This is because everything Apple make is a great idea but a bad execution in it’s launch version. It then burns out quickly or the screens break or some such disaster befalls the early adopters. The second version is more robust, but the software is flakey or the connectivity is poor. You don’t really get a polished  version out until third time around – which will be good. However, for all it’s early problems, it will capture people’s imagination better than any of its rivals have and it will redefine the market place for these devices.

Several niche companies and several large companies will file patent infringement cases on its technology, interface or other aspects of it. These will variously go on for years and no one will remember what they were all about when they eventually get settled.

It will be plaigiarised – or perhaps I should say it will inspire Microsoft and others like Nokia, Dell, and a load of firms from China – who will claim they were working on their version of it all along. These will get launched about a year later and spontaneously look remarkably like Apple’s product. They will be called ‘ePads’, ‘xPads’ and ‘MyPads’. Everyone will then get sued by Always Ultra who whose own iPad product will do something completely different. All the Windows based clones will be really fiddly, stuffed full of lots of features and complicated interfaces. They will impress the editors of computer mags but inadvertently reinforce the Apple iPad (or whatever it gets called) as a people’s favourite.

A final word or warning: You will need to watch out for slightly insecure and over-paid people conspicuously taking their Apple iPad to the pub and making sure everyone can see they have one.

16 Dec 09 Rage Against The X Factor

#Xfactor I read that Simon Cowell said that the Facebook campaign to get Rage Against the Machine’s (RATM) 1992 song, Killing in the Name, to Christmas No 1 ‘stupid’ and ‘cynical’…”

Which of course it is, but to be even handed about this, the use that Cowell makes of mass media is cynical.

Cowell has his own private TV channel-to-market. He overwhelmingly uses it to manufacture pop stars for his own label, and promote other artists of his. He also times the whole thing to cash in on the most lucrative time for music sales. This is overwhelmingly to his benefit and no one else – cynical would you say?.

What makes me sad is that while The X Factor is aired, there cannot be another proper Christmas song like Merry Xmas Everybody (Slade), Happy Christmas – War is Over (John and Yoko), I Believe In Father Christmas (Greg Lake), Stop The Cavalry (Jonah Lewie) or even White Christmas (Bing Crosby). Those songs have some lasting appeal and seasonal poignancy, but the X Factor ‘product’ is generally forgettable or even disposable, as are many of the ‘stars’ manufactured by the show. YTou don’t think so? Series 1 – Steve Brookstein; Series 2 – Shayne Ward; Series 3 – Leona Lewis; Series 4 – Leon Jackson; Series 5 – Alexandra Burke; Series 6 – Joe McElderry. While Leona Lewis seems to have cracked it, it’s about time. The others are all very distant memories and one suspects that Alexandra Burke will be next years Leon Ward and this year’s winner, Joe McElderry, will ultimately be another Shayne Ward.

I have no specific problem with Joe McElderry. I am sure he is a nice guy, he does have a good voice, he looks like Donny Osmond did when he used to activate hormones in teenage girls and at least Joe has won a ‘talent competition’. Or has he? Cowell says the RATM campaign is aimed at him. I rather think it is aimed at the thing he has built. “Is this a singing competition” judge Danii Minogue asked before judging against the diatonically deaf duo of Jedward. However, in a previous week, having savaged their every performance, Cowell kept them in the show at the expense of Lucie Jones, one of the better vocalists in the competition. Cowell’s cynical support of Jedward was clearly to maintain ratings and ad revenue, because they were less talented, less entertaining and less likely to win than any other act. FFS they were booed every bloody week.

So, while I don’t really like the Rage Against The Machine single (you are not really meant to, it is acid in the eyes sort of art), but I  hope it succeeds. Not for its own merits, but to open up the future possibility of some proper Christmas songs which are not so cynically mass marketed.

11 Dec 09 Dropping Pianos on Accountants

Dropping A Piano (Accountant underneath)

Dropping A Piano (Accountant underneath)

‘Accountancy Recruitment’ is a two word title, both words being metaphors for ‘sedative’. Have you ever seen a job ad for an accountant that read “…exciting opportunity for the right accountant”? It is somehow not believable, an oxymoron. My first thought is that the ‘right accountant’ would have to have so little electrical activity in the brain that magnolia paint would be an exciting opportunity.

But then every now and again you come across an article such as Chris Cutting’s what happens when you drop a piano on an accountant. The point he makes is that in a given set of circumstances there will be many who will follow the same set of ‘rules’. The things you always do, the sum total of experience and education. For most, the temptation is, when something goes wrong, to tighten your resolve and do more of the same things as properly as you know how. The result is that you end up doing it wrong again, only this time thoroughly.

Those who know me, will know that one of my favourite phrases is “If you keep doing what you do, you’ll keep getting what you get”. For marketeers and designers, this is a self-evident truth. People will call us in to make a difference and then systematically try to force us to spontaneously provide exactly what they had that they decided needed changing. I once worked at BP and we had a load of consultants swanning about the place. If you went to fetch a coffee, they would declare your seat a ‘Hot desk’, sit there and not leave it until the end of the contract. But one such consultant from Andersens imparted the following wisdom upon me. “If it ain’t broke …break it”. It basically means that you can keep doing something for years and watch it work. Then one day it won’t work, the world changed while you weren’t looking. But because you have always done things the same way, it leaves you bereft of alternatives.

The points he, and Chris Cutting make is a good one. His is remedial, suggesting that you need to periodically tear down systems and proceedures and rebuild them. Chris’s, on the other hand, is preventative. He says that you need to find the sort of person who will have it within them to look up from time to time, spot the problem and break the inertia to avoid the problem.

For the right accountant, that is an exciting opportunity, and I imagine that finding the right accountant is not always the easiest thing to do.

The only thing I would add, is that if anyone does manage to drop a piano on an accountant, can they film it and get it on YouTube – there are lots of good SEO, Social Media and Marketing reasons why you should.

22 Nov 09 Cumbrian flood – worse than the flood is the flood publicity

Responding to The Guardian’s recent article After the deluge, a sodden Cumbria begins to clear up

flood

"…a tightly cut shot of the biggest puddle they could find"?

It occurred to me that the flood is not really the worst of it. After the cameras have gone, after the politicians have had their photo opportunity, after the waters (both real and metaphorical) have receded, you are left with one big mess to clear up. As always, you will have to do this yourself. All the political promises and commitments will disintegrate as soon as the publicity opportunity presented by your misfortune has passed.

As a victim of the 2007 floods (I live near Upton Upon Severn, Worcs) I am afraid to tell flood victims that their troubles are only just beginning.

For a couple of weeks, your towns will be filled with satellite dished transit vans and Ugg wearing radio and TV types hugging their North Face Jackets and sipping paper cups of tea between 30 second ‘live reports’ where they talk of ‘carnage strewn streets’ and other sound-bitten nonsense in front of tightly cut shots of the biggest puddle they can find.

For the first time in living memory you will see a recognisable politician or two: Gordon Brown and David Cameron will both turn up wearing their concerned faces and suggest everything from money to action but promise only to review things and report at some undefined point in the future. And then as soon as a cat gets run over outside Parliament, they will be gone and onto the next photo opportunity. In the next couple of months Kate Silverton (or similar) will show up and do an environment special for TV. In about six months Prince Charles will fly in and shake your hand. All of them will be doing it to fulfil their own remit and agendas. Strangely it won’t do you any good at all.

You will be left with a big mess, ruined houses, cowboy builders moving into your area and insurance companies. It took us eight months to get Zurich Insurance to even respond to our calls. They sent some loss adjusters round from time to time who started by throwing all our belongings away and variously described our situation as “a bit of DIY” through periodic derisory “final settlement offers” of £20k, then £25k and so it incrementally crept. The process slowly marches with infuriating inertia designed to make you desperate. If you snap and shout they offer you a few grand hoping you will take it so that they can kill off the file on their desks. To put it into perspective, they were trying to settle our case for £100,000 less than it cost to repair the property – and it took them over a year to get even that far. We were left entirely to own devices, we were taken for a ride by builder and engineers and all with the insurance industry nowhere to be seen. We were out of our house for two years, only moving back in in June this year. The bill ended up being £120k – all of it hard fought miles for us and achieved in spite of the insurance company, certainly not with their help.

At some point, you will be subjected to skewed research exercises asking all the wrong questions. The research will all be designed to conclude that you actually need something cheap like better flood warnings when everyone else knows that you need serious investment in flood defenses.

You will spend months and years living in holiday flats and other temporary accommodation. Your childrens’ right to attend local schools will then come under threat, you will never receive complete compensation for all you have lost and when it is all behind you, you will not be able to sell your house.

If you are a victim of this flood, this is probably not what you want to hear, but you might as well hear it from someone who has been through it rather than any number of people who don’t know what they are talking about and feel that now would be a good to time to tell you how you are feeling, what you should do, where you should live and why it’s all your fault for living on a flood plain – Even if you haven’t personally been flooded, try selling your house and moving now your area is blighted by flood publicity.

29 Oct 09 I’ve found Grandma stuck in the Motherboard

In response to The Computer Swallowed Grandma

Oh I think I’ve found a grandma
Inside my motherboard
She was frying up the chip set
And shouting at The sound card

She hijacked the internal buses
And took them for a ride
And before she could jump off
She was at it with the main drive

But Grandma didn’t know
If she should wipe or copy
So she looked inside it’s bytes and bits
Saying “Is your drive hard or floppy?”

“Illegal operand”
The computer verified
“You must be corrupted
Access is denied”

“Bloody piece of junk”
Grandma answered seething
“Please shut down” the computer said
“My CPU Overheating”

“Your CPU, YOUR CPU?”
Said Grandma with a thwack
“Don’t you mean the ‘slotty box thing’
With spaghetti round the back”

“Does not compute Does Not Compute”
Computed the computer
“UNMOUNTABLE_BOOT_VOLUME:
Please reboot your router”

“If I reboot you’ll know it”
Said Grandma exasperated
“What’s the router anyway?
It’s all so complicated”

“The router’s by the phone
It’s the ugly device
That will not match the wallpaper
and has lots of flashing lights”

“Well why did you not say so”
Answered Grandma going insane
“You’re supposed to make life easier
But you just hurt my brain”

“Callibrate your monitor”
The computer rudely beeped
“Do what?” said gran “Try again
In English if you please”

“In fact stop, you bloody box of wires
While I give you a lesson
Put yourself on stand-by
For an interactive session”

You will not call me ‘user’
I don’t approve of drugs
You will not accuse me of illegal operations
and make me feel like a thug.

I don’t ‘login’, I switch on
I don’t ‘key-in’ I type
It’s not a monitor, it’s a telly
It’s called ‘computer phone’ not Skype

If you have a virus,
Kindly keep it to yourself
I’ve lived three score and ten
In largely perfect health

I really don’t appreciate
Meaningless error codes
If something’s wrong, soldier on
It’s how we won the war you know

And finally would it hurt
Sometimes to just say ‘Please’
Now shut up, power down
And make me a cup of tea.”

29 Oct 09 The Computer Swallowed Grandma

I received this from my mother

Yes, honestly its true!
She pressed ‘control’ and ‘enter’
And disappeared from view.

It devoured her completely,
The thought just makes me squirm.
She must have caught a virus
Or been eaten by a worm.

I’ve searched through the recycle bin
And files of every kind;
I’ve even used the Internet,
But nothing did I find.

In desperation, I asked Google
My searches to refine.
The reply from them was negative,
Not a thing was found ‘online.’

So, if inside your ‘Inbox,’
My Grandma you should see,
Please ‘Copy,”Scan’ and ‘Paste’ her
And send her back to me.

This is a tribute to all the Grandmas who have been fearless and learned to use the Computer…….. They are the greatest!!!

We do not stop playing because we grow old;
We grow old because we stop playing .
NEVER Be The First To Get Old!

And here is my response: I’ve found Grandma Stuck in the Motherboard

26 Aug 09 By the way – I am not responsible for Harry Potter

As some of you have spotted, have a number of hats. I am Dave Yates, the much respected bicycle designer. Sometimes I am also Dave Yates, the force behind LottaLinuxLinks. But most famously, I make films. I started by making the Flumps back in the 70′s and more recently I have been helping out JK Rowling by being David Yates, the much respected film director, responsible for the recent Harry Potter films.

When I say much respected, I did receive this message through the feedback form on the site from Stephanie, ‘an admirer’:

hello. i just got back from seeing harry potter and the half blood prince and i hated it! you did a horrible job putting the movie together and it was nothing like the book. there was part were I wonder “Did this happen?’ or “Was this in the book because I don’t remeber this?”. For example the scene where harry and ginny are outside mrs. weasley’s home and bellatrix and grayback were chasing them. I am very displeased about this movie, but the fifth movie you directed was pretty good.

I have news for you Stephanie, it’s only pretend.

One thought occurs to me, just don’t watch the films – I don’t want you ruining the experience my audience has anyway. How about getting a life instead of complaining about a film about a fairy story not being true to a book about a fairy story.  And if you didn’t like this one, wait until you see what a complete fuck up I’ve made of the next one.

17 May 09 Zopa – that’s more like it

Ever since the banks rained on my pretty miserable parade, I have been seething.

See: Going to Hell in a Ferrari with a bonus stuffed in it’s pocket.

As I understand it the banks in America lent lots of money to people who could not afford to pay it back so they could buy houses they couldn’t afford. Because these people were such a bad risk and couldn’t get a loan anywhere else, the banks found they could charge more interest because they were desperate. So, obscenely the banks made the poor poorer by punishing them for being poor.

But the way America works is that if you can’t afford your mortgage you just leave the key in the door and walk out – no strings attached. And given that every market expert, and even market ignoramuses realised that housing was going to drop in value it didn’t take much to work out that this was going to end in a financial disaster one day.

In the UK the banks took one look at the massive interest rates on offer and ignored the parlous state of the investment proposal and said “I’ll have some of that, in fact quite a lot”.

And then all the borrowers defaulted, all the property was worth less than all the loans and all the banks started falling to bits.

So the bank got the taxpayer to bail out the banks which means I am paying for their greedy stupidity. When they get it right they will keep their own profits while we still pay for the profligacy.

I hate them all and I have been trying to work out how to never have to deal with these shit-heads ever again. I think I might just have found it in Zopa.

Zopa, introduces borrowers to private lenders. Zopa is the financial equivalent of eBay, the auction website: it puts borrowers and lenders directly in touch with one another.

Sixty-three per cent are borrowers and 37 per cent lenders, with about 50 per cent of active lenders having already added to their original lending outlay.

The average gross return for lenders since launch has been 6.83 per cent (including Zopa’s 0.5 per cent fee, but excluding tax). Lenders bear the risk of defaults directly, although bad debts to date have affected only 0.05 per cent of the loans made.

What is more, the risk of defaults is diluted by the spreading of any loan across a number of borrowers. In addition, Zopa carries out full credit checks on all borrowers. The appeal for lenders is not only the prospect of higher rates of return than those provided by banks and building societies but also the transparency of the costs and the control that direct lending gives them over their money.

The benefits for borrowers are that interest rates can be lower than those charged by traditional lenders and that there are no early repayment penalties.

From my perspective another major benefit is that this bank cannot take the whole economy on a handcart ride to hell, because there are no duplicitous plutocrats urinating on the rest of us while they use our money to back the nearest three legged horse in the Grand National because its odds are 5000 to 1.

Guardian on Zopa

14 May 09 Gordon Brown on Expenses and other problems

This just about sums up the entire fiasco concerning the government, in fact every single grubby, thieving, grasping MP. I came across this on You Tube. I suggest if you are offended by foul language you do not play the video.

What might make you use a few four letter words of your own is this list from The Times. It shows the expenses revealed in the latest round of  expenses abuse. And as every new revelation and grubby little member plays what used to be called ‘They don’t know so we don’t care” and is now called “Shit! Busted”. I hope the Time don’t mind me reposting it here – it really ought to be publicised as widely as possible. Personally I would like them to all resign and be suspended from standing for Parliament for ten years. It’s still better than the conviction and criminal record the rest of us would have faced if we had ever found a way of doing this in our own lives.

THE EYE-WATERING CLAIMS

  • Douglas Hogg Former Agriculture minister Mr Hogg has been paid more than £20,000 a year between 2004 and 2008 in second home allowances, it has been revealed. Among the costs itemised were £2,115 for having a moat cleared, £646.25 for “general repairs, stable etc” and £40 for piano tuning, the Telegraph said.
  • Hazel Blears The Communities Secretary claimed for three different properties in a single year, spending almost £5,000 of taxpayers’ money on furniture in three months. She also avoided capital gains tax on her £45,000 profit when she sold a London flat by telling Inland Revenue it was her main home, and thus exempt – despite its being registered with the Commons as her second home. On Tuesday night Ms Blears said she would voluntarily pay £13,332 to the taxman
  • Sir Michael Spicer Sir Michael, who is chairman of the influential Conservative 1922 Committee of back bench MPs, has claimed £620 for the installation of a chandelier and rewiring work and more than £1,000 for servicing an oven, The Daily Telegraph said. He also claimed more than £5,650 for gardening work at his Worcestershire manor house, as well as £4,000 for council tax on two homes. Other items reportedly claimed included £3,000 for roof repairs and £2,350 for work on his chimney.
  • John Prescott The taxpayer paid for the former deputy prime minister to fit the front of his home in Hull with mock Tudor boards and for his toilet seat to be repaired twice in two years.
  • David Heathcoat-Amory The Tory MP for Wells in Somerset reportedly claimed £388.80 for horse manure between 2004 and 2007. He also submitted a bill of £986.17 for heating oil in January 2008, and between July and September 2007 Mr Heathcoat-Amory also claimed £1,792.50 worth of invoices from a gardening firm.
  • David Miliband The Foreign Secretary claimed almost £30,000 for doing up his £120,000 constituency home over five years, it was reported. He spent up to £180 every three months on the garden at the property in South Shields. At the bottom of one receipt for £132.96 in April 2008, his gardener wrote a note questioning whether some of the work was necessary.
  • Alan Duncan The shadow leader of the Commons claimed thousands of pounds for his garden before agreeing with the fees office that the spending “could be considered excessive”. Millionaire Mr Duncan recouped £4,000 over three years. However, a £3,194 bill for gardening in March 2007 was not paid after officials responded suggesting that the claim might not be “within the spirit” of the rules, according to the Daily Telegraph. In a letter to the MP for Rutland and Melton, the fees office said that it expected gardening costs “to cover only basic essentials such as grass cutting”. In March 2007, Mr Duncan claimed £598 to overhaul a ride-on lawn-mower and then a further £41 to fix a puncture a month later. Mr Duncan is also said to have claimed £1,400 a month for mortgage interest on his home in Rutland. On Tuesday Mr Duncan refunded £4,704.86 of his gardening claims
  • Margaret Beckett The Housing Minister found herself in trouble with the Fees Office after attempting to claim £600 for hanging baskets and pot plants.
  • Michael Gove Mr Gove – the Shadow School Secretary and a close ally of Mr Cameron – spent more than £7,000 in five months furnishing a London property in 2006 before “flipping” his second home designation to a new property he bought in Surrey. He then apparently claimed more than £13,000 in stamp duty and other fees from his Parliamentary expenses for this property. On Tuesday Mr Gove repaid £7,000 of furniture costs and £500 he claimed for nights staying at the Garrick club in London
  • Ken Clarke The former Chancellor’s book-keeping skills “leave much to be desired” according to the newspaper. Mr Clarke, now Shadow Business Secretary, was apparently asked repeatedly to submit receipts for thousands of pounds in claims for security and cleaning at his second home in London. The records also revealed he does not claim a council tax discount of up to 10% to which he should be entitled having designated the property as his second home. On Tuesday Mr Clarke repaid £600 relating to council tax
  • Margaret Moran The Labour MP for Luton switched her second home to the house she shares with her partner, 100 miles from her constituency – just days before spending £22,500 on treating dry rot at the seafront property. On Tuesday Ms Moran promised to repay the £22,500
  • Francis Maude The Shadow Cabinet Office minister claimed almost £35,000 over two years for a mortgage on a London flat a few minutes walk from a house he already owned and then rented out. The taxpayer footed the £387.50 bill for moving his effects down the road. He also tried to claim mortgage interest on his family home in Sussex, but the arrangement was reportedly rejected by the Fees Office. On Tuesday party leader David Cameron banned Mr Maude from claiming the second homes allowance in future
  • Stephen Byers The former Labour Trade Secretary used the expenses system to claim more than £125,000 for the London flat owned by his partner. Over the past five years, Mr Byers spent more than £27,000 on redecoration, maintenance and appliances at the flat in Camden, north London. The claims included extensive renovations to the outside of the entire building, which consists of four flats. Documents showed Mr Byers put the entire £12,000 bill for the work – including his partner’s share – on expenses.
  • David Willetts The shadow innovation, universities and skills secretary claimed £115 plus VAT to replace 25 light bulbs at his second home in west London. On the same claim – part of a £2,191 invoice for odd jobs that included cleaning a shower head – Mr Willetts charged another £80 to “change light bulbs in bathroom”. But parliamentary authorities pared the bill back by more than £1,000, refusing to refund £175 for a dog enclosure and £750 for a shed base. According to the Telegraph, the fees office frequently cut his claims because of errors or overclaims. On Tuesday Mr Willetts repaid the £115 plus VAT for fitting the light bulbs
  • John Reid According to leaked receipts, the former Home Secretary appears to enjoy his creature comforts when in his Scottish constituency. Mr Reid’s claims included a £199 pouffe, a £370 armchair, an £899 sofa and a £29.99 a “black glitter toilet seat”.
  • James Arbuthnot Mr Arbuthnot claimed £1,471 for “grass, trim, pool, fuel” costs associated with the garden of his property in Hampshire. During the period May to October 2007, he also submitted a claim for £2,433 “for the expense of our housekeeper”. Furnishing he asked to be reimbursed included £728 for a new television and £100 for a sign at his new home. In total, the chairman of the Defence Select Committee has claimed £108,062 over the past five years – the maximum amount possible according to the paper. On Sunday he said he would be repaying the swimming pool work claims
  • Cheryl Gillan The shadow Welsh Secretary spent £4.47 of taxpayers’ money on dog food. The fees office also reduced a claim for a gas bill because the statement showed Ms Gillan’s account was in credit. On Sunday Ms Gillan said she would repay the £4.47 she had claimed by mistake
  • Oliver Letwin Mr Letwin, who is in charge of drawing up the Conservative general election manifesto, claimed more than £2,000 to replace a leaking pipe under his tennis court. He said he had been ordered to mend the pipe by the local water company and did not make any improvements to the court or his garden. The taxpayer also picked up the tab for regular services to his Aga cooker. On Tuesday Mr Letwin repaid the £2,000
  • Chris Huhne The Liberal Democrats home affairs spokesman regularly submits claims for food and groceries including pints of milk, fluffy dusters and chocolate biscuits. Millionaire Mr Huhne, who is MP for Eastleigh in Hampshire, also expensed a £119 trouser press which was delivered to his main London home. On Monday Mr Huhne said he had repaid the cost of the press
  • Lembit Opik The Liberal Democrat housing spokesman billed a £40 summons for the non-payment of council tax on a flat to his second home expenses. On Monday Mr Opik said he will pay back the £40
  • Andrew George The Liberal Democrat MP has claimed £847 a month for a riverside flat in London used by his student daughter, according to the Telegraph. Mr George, who is MP for St Ives in Cornwall, said his daughter Morvah, 21, had access to the property in Rotherhithe but was not the sole user.
  • Sir Menzies Campbell Former Liberal Democrat leader Sir Menzies spent nearly £10,000 of taxpayer funds refurbishing his central London flat. Among the items claimed were a new king-size bed worth £1,024, bed linen worth £373 and five cushions costing £176.25. He also claimed thousands of pounds of food over the summer recess. On Wednesday Sir Menzies said he would repay the £1,490.66 fee to the interior designer who oversaw the work on his flat
  • Julia Goldsworthy The Liberal Democrat local government spokesman spent thousands of pounds on furniture just days before the deadline for using up parliamentary allowances, it was reported. She bought a £999 TV, £1,500 of furniture in House of Fraser and a £1,200 leather rocking chair from upmarket furniture store Heal’s on March 28 and 29, 2006. The House of Commons financial year ends at the beginning of April, after which expenses incurred must be set against a new allowance. Ms Goldsworthy said that she had claimed “reasonable” costs for furnishings. On Wednesday Ms Goldsworthy said she would repay £1,005 she claimed for the chair

THE LEADERS

  • Gordon Brown Mr Brown used his expenses to pay his brother Andrew £6,577 for cleaning work at his Westminster flat between 2004 and 2006. The brothers shared the cleaner at their two flats. Under the arrangement, Andrew Brown paid the cleaner and the Prime Minister reimbursed his share of the cost.
  • David Cameron The Tory leader claimed a total of £82,450 on his second home allowance over five years. The majority of Mr Cameron’s claims were for mortgage interest and utility bills for his Oxfordshire constituency home. One exception was a £680 bill for repairs to the property, which included clearing wisteria and vines from a chimney, replacing outside lights and resealing his conservatory’s roof. The newspaper reported Mr Cameron’s expenses appeared relatively straightforward compared to other members of the shadow cabinet. On Tuesday Mr Cameron repaid the £680 maintenance bill
  • Nick Clegg The Liberal Democrat leader reportedly had his second home allowance docked last year after exceeding the £23,083 maximum by more than £100. Other claims made included £1,657.32 for food, and phone bills which included calls to Colombia and Vietnam. He said that when he sells his second home, any profit will go back to the taxpayer. On Tuesday Mr Clegg said he had paid back the £80.20 cost of the international calls

CABINET AND SHADOW CABINET

  • Alistair Darling The Chancellor “switched” the location of his second home four times in four years, allowing him to claim thousands of pounds towards the cost of his Edinburgh home and for the London flat, it was reported. The taxpayer contributed almost £10,000 towards the cost of furnishing the Chancellor’s London flat, including £2,074 for furniture and £2,339 for “magnolia” carpets. The public also footed the bills for £765 from Ikea and £768 from Marks and Spencer for a bed.
  • George Osborne The parliamentary authorities considered the Shadow Chancellor’s personal website too “political” to be publicly funded, the newspaper said.  After claiming £30 for a private company to host the site, Mr Osborne was told by an official: “I draw your attention to the ’Latest News’ section of your webpage. This includes some articles … which contain clearly political content and are therefore not acceptable on a publicly funded website.” He also put a £440.62 bill for a chauffeur company to drive him from Cheshire to London on November 11 2005 on expenses. While the invoice offered a 5 per cent discount for “prompt settlement”, Mr Osborne received the full amount. The records showed he also claimed hundreds of pounds for cleaning and remortgaged his second home in Cheshire, increasing his monthly mortgage interest bill from £1,560 a month to nearly £1,900. On Tuesday Mr Osborne refunded the £440.62 chauffeur’s bill
  • Lord Mandelson The Business Secretary claimed thousands of pounds for work on his constituency home in Hartlepool shortly after announcing his resignation as an MP, it was reported. He renovated the terrace house in 2004 and sold it for a £136,000 profit. Lord Mandelson’s spokesman insisted the expenditure was to repair the property, “not improve it”.
  • Geoff Hoon The Transport Secretary was able to switch his second home in a way which allowed him to improve his family home in Derbyshire at taxpayers’ expense before buying a London townhouse.
  • Chris Grayling The Shadow Home Secretary received thousands of pounds to renovate a London flat, even though his constituency home in Surrey is only 17 miles from Parliament. Mr Grayling, who already apparently owned three properties within the M25, bought the flat with loans subsidised by the taxpayer. In an unusual move, Mr Grayling negotiated an arrangement with the fees office that allowed him to claim £625 a month for mortgages on two separate properties – the main home in Ashtead, Surrey, and the new flat. An exception to the rules was made for the Epsom and Ewell MP because he was unable to obtain a 100% mortgage on the flat. He is also alleged to have delayed putting in claims for decorating and refurbishing costs so he could receive the maximum in Additional Costs Allowance (ACA) over consecutive years. On Tuesday Mr Cameron banned Mr Grayling from claiming the second homes allowance in future
  • Jack Straw The Justice Secretary claimed for the full cost of council tax, even though he received a 50% discount from his local authority. He repaid the money last summer, shortly after a High Court ruling requiring the receipts to be published. In a note to the fees office he wrote: “Accountancy does not appear to be my strongest suit.”
  • Nick Herbert The shadow environment secretary claimed back £10,000 of the £14,700 stamp duty when he bought a home with his partner in his constituency. He also charged for fees and a survey of the property in Arundel, West Sussex and claimed for the entire monthly mortgage interest even though his partner’s name was on the deeds.
  • Andy Burnham The Culture Secretary wrote a note to the fees office in which he pleaded for his expenses to be paid urgently and even wrote he “might be in line for a divorce” if the money did not materialise within days.
  • Andrew Lansley The Shadow Health Secretary spent thousands of pounds renovating a thatched Tudor country cottage – and sold it shortly afterwards. He redecorated with premium paint in some rooms at a cost of £2,000 and spent more than £500 having the driveway re-shingled. He is then said to have “flipped” his expenses to a Georgian flat in London, and claimed for thousands of pounds in furnishings, including a Laura Ashley sofa. On Tuesday Mr Lansley repaid £2,600 he claimed for house renovations
  • Shaun Woodward Taxpayers contributed almost £100,000 to help pay the mortgage on Mr Woodward’s £1.35 million flat – one of seven properties owned by the multi-millionaire Northern Ireland Secretary.
  • Caroline Flint The Europe minister put solicitors’ fees and stamp duty totalling £14,553 on her Parliamentary expenses after buying a central London flat.
  • Paul Murphy The Welsh Secretary used his second home allowance to buy the freehold on a flat close to Parliament, putting the arrangement fees and stamp duty on his expenses. He also claimed for decorating and furnishing costs, including £35 for a toilet roll holder, £537 for an oven, a £605 TV and a £449 sound system.
  • Douglas Alexander Mr Alexander’s constituency home was damaged in a house fire in 2007 after he spent more than £30,000 doing it up, the newspaper reported. The International Development Secretary told the fees office he was “under-insured” and claimed almost £2,000 on items lost in the fire, which he later repaid when his insurers reimbursed him.
  • Theresa Villiers The shadow transport secretary claimed nearly £16,000 in stamp duty and fees for a London flat, despite already having another house in the capital only 14 miles from Westminster, it was reported. On Tuesday Mr Cameron said that Ms Villiers would no longer claim the second homes allowance

BACKBENCHERS AND THE REST

  • Michael Martin Mr Martin, who as Commons speaker fought to prevent MPs’ expenses claims entering the public domain, spent more than £1,400 on chauffeurs in his Glasgow constituency.
  • Phil Hope The health minister for care services claimed £41,709 over five years on furniture and fittings for his “modest” two-bedroomed flat in south London. The items claimed included a new kitchen, seven doors, wooden flooring, bedroom furniture, chairs and tables, two bookcases, a television, a £120 barbecue and £61 of gardening materials – despite a Commons ban on claiming for garden equipment. On Wednesday Mr Hope promised to refund the £41,709 in full
  • Barry Gardiner The MP for Brent North made a profit of almost £200,000 from a flat mortgaged and renovated with the help of taxpayers’ cash, it was alleged.
  • Vera Baird QC Mrs Baird, who as Solicitor General is one of the Government’s top legal advisers, fell foul of expenses rules after trying to claim for Christmas decorations. Officials rejected the £268 invoice.
  • Sinn Fein Five Sinn Fein MPs raked in expenses of almost £500,000 for running a second home, despite not taking up their seats in the Commons. The party’s two most senior figures, president Gerry Adams and Northern Ireland deputy first minister Martin McGuinness, were said to have jointly claimed £3,600 a month to rent a shared two-bedroom flat in the capital, which a local estate agent suggested would be worth £1,400 a month.
  • The three other MPs together claimed £5,400 a month to rent a shared town house estimated to be worth around £1,800 a month.
  • John Gummer The former Tory cabinet minister claimed £9,000 a year for gardening, charging the taxpayer hundreds of pounds for treating insect “infestations” and removing moles and jackdaw nests from his Suffolk property, and for an annual “rodent service”.
  • Tony Blair The former Prime Minister was able to use his parliamentary expenses to remortgage his constituency home for £296,000 – nearly 10 times what he paid for it – just months before buying a west London house for £3.65 million. The claims, some of which were revealed last year under a Freedom of Information request, showed interest repayments on his constituency home amounted to almost a third of the new mortgage. The London town house was one of five properties owned by Mr Blair – reportedly worth a total of £10 million, the newspaper reported.
  • Kevin Brennan The junior minister was said to have had a £450 widescreen television delivered to his family home in Wales and then claimed it on his allowance for his second home in London.
  • Kitty Ussher The Department for Work and Pensions minister drew up a list of renovations she hoped to make to her London house and asked Commons officials to “pay as much as you are able!”
  • Iain Wright and Tom Watson Mr Wright, a junior housing minister, asked if he could buy furniture before he had even bought the property he shares with Mr Watson. He was told it would be better to wait until after the general election in case he lost his seat.
  • He told the Commons authorities: “It seems stupid to carry it over into next year when a large chunk of my (allowance) would go unused.”
  • Greg Barker Mr Barker – the first prominent Tory to be caught up in the expenses row – reportedly made a £320,000 profit on a flat he bought at the taxpayers’ expense.
  • Stewart Jackson The Tory communities spokesman has claimed more than £66,000 for his family home in Peterborough, the paper said. He billed the taxpayer for £304.10 for work on the swimming pool, and more than £11,000 in professional fees and costs incurred with the move to the property in 2005. According to the report, household items claimed include a £3,000 berber carpet, a £741 king size bed and £775 for plumbing work in his summer room. He said he would be repaying the money claimed for the swimming pool work.
  • David Davis The former shadow Home Secretary spent more than £10,000 of taxpayers’ money on home improvements in four years, including a £5,700 portico at his home in Yorkshire, it was disclosed. He also claimed more than £2,000 for the cost of mowing and rolling two paddocks at his home.
  • Sir Alan Haselhurst The Deputy Speaker has charged taxpayers almost £12,000 for gardening bills at his Essex farmhouse, the report said. He told the paper that the gardener “does all the heavy work which I don’t have the opportunity to do when I’m in London.”
  • Michael Ancram The former Conservative deputy leader charged the cost of having his swimming pool boiler serviced to his parliamentary allowances, it was reported. Records seen by the paper show £98.58 was claimed for the boiler repair, as well as more than £3,000 in cleaning costs and £1,250 of gardening expenses in a single year. He said none of his items claimed “could be considered extravagant or luxurious”.
  • Bob Marshall-Andrews The left wing Labour MP has claimed £118,000 for expenses at his second home, including stereo equipment, redecoration and a pair of Kenyan carpets, The Daily Telegraph said. In 2006 he claimed £750 on a “multi-room audio system” and £830 on a DVD recorder and other electrical goods. He has also claimed almost £1,300 for an intercom, brass name plaque and other door adornments. Mr Marshall-Andrews said the claims for his TV and DVD recorder were “met” from second home allowances “in error”. They were mainly for office use and should have been claimed accordingly, he told the paper. He added that all other claims were “within the spirit and letter of the law”.
  • Alan Reid The Liberal Dem MP for Argyll and Bute in Scotland has claimed more than £1,500 for staying in hotels and bed and breakfasts in his constituency, according to the Telegraph. The paper said he put in receipts for eight nights in Scottish lodgings during 2005/06, but was told by the Commons fees office that stays in constituency hotels could not be claimed. In 2007/08, he also claimed for three stays in Scottish hotels including one overlooking Loch Etive and one of the Isle of Bute, 38 miles from his designated second home.
  • Norman Baker The campaigning Liberal Democrat MP asked the Commons fees office if he could claim for a bicycle for use between his London flat and Parliament. The request was denied.